Journal article
Psychological Science, 2022
APA
Click to copy
Smiley, A. H., & Fisher, M. (2022). The golden age is behind us: How the status quo impacts the evaluation of technology. Psychological Science.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Smiley, Adam H., and Matthew Fisher. “The Golden Age Is behind Us: How the Status Quo Impacts the Evaluation of Technology.” Psychological Science (2022).
MLA
Click to copy
Smiley, Adam H., and Matthew Fisher. “The Golden Age Is behind Us: How the Status Quo Impacts the Evaluation of Technology.” Psychological Science, 2022.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{adam2022a,
title = {The golden age is behind us: How the status quo impacts the evaluation of technology},
year = {2022},
journal = {Psychological Science},
author = {Smiley, Adam H. and Fisher, Matthew}
}
New technology invariably provokes concerns over potential societal impacts. Even as risks often fail to materialize, the fear continues. The current research explored the psychological underpinnings of this pattern. Across four studies (N = 2,454 adults recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk), we found evidence for the role of status quo thinking in evaluating technology. In Study 1, we experimentally manipulated the reported age of unfamiliar technology and found that people evaluate it more favorably when it is described as originating before (vs. after) their birth. In Studies 2 through 4, participants’ age at the time of invention strongly predicts attitudes toward a wide range of real-world technologies. Finally, we found that individual differences in status-quo-based decision-making moderated evaluations of technology. These studies provide insight into how people respond to the rapidly changing technological landscape.